I generally like Kilo's posts/articles, but this one is rough. This is just complaining about a theory of a commercial fork which is itself a flawed assessment as this is more akin to a rebrand (as another person pointed out). There's literally no mention here of the performance of the product. There's no actual problem pointed out here other than the fact that (apparently) forking proprietary products is bad and deserves a sassy term like PORK. What was the point of this article?
The TLDR I'm taking away here is "Antigravity is a fork of Windsurf. Forks are bad when they are commercial forks, but good when they are open-source forks. Also, Kilo is a plugin so you can chose your IDE, therefor it's better than Antigravity".
I read almost every Kilo post, but this is was not a good idea, I agree with other comments. Anyway, let's focus on Kilo improvements.
I generally like Kilo's posts/articles, but this one is rough. This is just complaining about a theory of a commercial fork which is itself a flawed assessment as this is more akin to a rebrand (as another person pointed out). There's literally no mention here of the performance of the product. There's no actual problem pointed out here other than the fact that (apparently) forking proprietary products is bad and deserves a sassy term like PORK. What was the point of this article?
The TLDR I'm taking away here is "Antigravity is a fork of Windsurf. Forks are bad when they are commercial forks, but good when they are open-source forks. Also, Kilo is a plugin so you can chose your IDE, therefor it's better than Antigravity".
The thing is Antigravity is actually good though hahaha
I like your product, but this is a bad take. It isn't a fork of windsurf, it's a rebranding.